Shitty Superbowl

Play Ball!
Post Reply
CatCity
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 6213
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 8:55 pm

Shitty Superbowl

Post by CatCity »

this game sucked. clearly not the best of the nfl going head to head
User avatar
Alexnova
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 7984
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Countdown To Armageddon
Contact:

Post by Alexnova »

The Seattle Seahawks had so many oppurtunities. Their receivers couldn't catch a damn ball.

Shaun Alexander couldn't get the ball moving, they gave it to him about 40 times that game.

In fact Rothelisberger made more running yards than Alexander. That's hilarious.


But I thought it was a great game. Of course being a Steelers fan, it was an emotional roller coaster.

As soon as Rothelisberger threw that interception, I immediatley had to do something else for awhile. I couldn't believe that.


AFC owns. Patritos, Colts and the Broncos would of smashed the Seahawks regardless, even if the Steelers didn't go in the bowl.

I'm glad Steelers won. They deserve it.
Image
:evil5:
User avatar
pnutwannabe
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Your local abandonment
Contact:

Post by pnutwannabe »

the NFC is by far the weaker of the 2
Image

:evil5:
User avatar
fahrenheit311
The soul that you have is electricity
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 3:44 pm

Post by fahrenheit311 »

Shaun Alexander couldn't get the ball moving, they gave it to him about 40 times that game.
In fact Rothelisberger made more running yards than Alexander. That's hilarious.
Roethlisberger-7 carries, 25 yds, 1 "TD"
Alexander-20 carries, 95 yards. :roll:
Thats 4.8 a carry. Cant ask for much more than that (and he wouldve got a td if it werent for the phantom holding call that took away the stevens catch at the 1). But 95 yds is better than parker, and he busted one out for 75 yds. Alexander was the least of the hawks problems (catch a damn pass).
User avatar
Alexnova
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 7984
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Countdown To Armageddon
Contact:

Post by Alexnova »

That's the last time I listen to facts from a SPORTS RADIO HOST.

Anyway, 4 yards a carry isn't much methinks.

What the Seakhawks should of had were RECEIVERS.
Image
:evil5:
User avatar
Homebrew311
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 4:45 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by Homebrew311 »

It's not 4, it's 4.8 and that's a lot per carry, dumbass.
User avatar
Alexnova
Taiyed Brodel
Posts: 7984
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Countdown To Armageddon
Contact:

Post by Alexnova »

Homebrew311 wrote:It's not 4, it's 4.8 and that's a lot per carry, dumbass.
Calm down its just a game.
Image
:evil5:
Post Reply