The Beatles Vs. The Rolling Stones

soundsystem 311 · Post by **soundsystem 311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:02 pm

Okay two great bands here who do you think is better? It's kind of a hard questions if you like both of 'em. Even though The Beatles are fucking amazing i'd choose The Rolling Stones. Your Thoughts?

CULTI-VADER · Post by **CULTI-VADER** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:10 pm

i think 311 is better

miT_311 · Post by **miT_311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:11 pm

CULTI-VADER wrote:i think 311 is better

DoYouRight311 · Post by **DoYouRight311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:14 pm

i think 311 is better too but comparing the beatles to the rolling stones doesnt really match. The beatles burn them

Shiny · Post by **Shiny** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:20 pm

Neither!

Cerpin Taxt · Post by **Cerpin Taxt** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:07 pm

Shiny wrote:Neither!

they are only given credit because of the baby boomers. they grew up loving them and to this day still do. OVER RATED!

Hostile_Apostle311 · Post by **Hostile_Apostle311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:10 pm

Beatles.

soundsystem 311 · Post by **soundsystem 311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:39 pm

I was just asking between the beatles and the stones who do ya think is better obviously 311 is always on top

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:25 pm

One more thing.. 311 isn't better than The Beatles.

miT_311 · Post by **miT_311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:26 pm

Element wrote:One more thing.. 311 isn't better than The Beatles.

go away. am i the only one who truely thinks the beatles arent that good?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:29 pm

You've never been to a 311 concert.

HAHAHAAHH look at you!

miT_311 · Post by **miT_311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:32 pm

hey i have friends!
look at you!

ok not the best come back, but its a FUCKLOAD better than a picture of a hairless cat.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:37 pm

I like 311 more, but The Beatles are better.

miT_311 · Post by **miT_311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:39 pm

GOAT · Post by **GOAT** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:41 pm

who the hell are the beatles and rolling stons

$ayzak · Post by **$ayzak** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:53 pm

What kind of question is this?

It's common sense man, it's just woven into the fabric of music. The Beatles, hands down.

I do give the rollingstones credit for making wild horses.

But they're not even in the same ballpark.

DoYouRight311 · Post by **DoYouRight311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:57 pm

dont get me wrong The Beatles rock but they do get annoying after awhile

Cerpin Taxt · Post by **Cerpin Taxt** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm

the beatles were nothing but a boy band with limited musical talents. they really arent that good, but people live for them.

miT_311 · Post by **miT_311** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:18 pm

thank you

Shiny · Post by **Shiny** » Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:37 am

But are the Beatles only so good because they were different in their time period and are noted as legendary because of this? I think so. They win originality points for their time period...but I really don't think they are that great. I mean seriously, like Cerpin Taxt said, our parent generation grew up liking them because they were popular at the time...and the baton of thinking they are godly is being passed down to us. Of course when we see commercials and new commemorative albums and new compilations of OH MY FUCKING GOD THE BEATLES, BEATLE MANIAAA all over the place and our parents splooging over them, we'll listen to them with a higher sense of importance. But seriously, they were a novelty. Fuck the Beatles!

Not really, I just always wanted to say that.

They are overrated as balls though.