Homebrew311 wrote:That's just ridiculous. So you're saying that there is no point in being decent to others without the expectation of being rewarded in the afterlife?without god, all acts of morals,grace,kindness,honesty,generosity, ect are empty and hold no merit.
You missed the point of my statement or jumped to the wrong conclusion. Let me explain, basically we can acknowledge there is a such thing as good and bad. now if what is considered to be good or bad is determined by only man within one particular culture or society what have you, then consequently this law of right and wrong only extends from that individual. hence, like most of you i assume you believe that cultures reflect their own values of morals and the people subject to them except it. i don't follow suit on that. i don't think the idea of right and wrong comes from man. if it does, then it is indeed empty because it only reflects the individual or individuals involved in creating such a system. therefore, how can anyone really be considered wrong for disagreeing or violating it. this brings you to my original statement that you commented on. if you do nice things in order to be rewarded then where is the reward in that? an act of kindness is only true when it is done in a self-less manner, absent from the pride of the individual. what is right does not come from man, but from god. if it came from just man than it can't be anymore empty and self serving. you were stating that i was saying to only be nice for the reason of going to heaven, which is false(you don't go to heaven for just being nice). your nice because you know that it is right, and by right i mean it extends beyond the imperfect hands of man. i love ontological discussions.