No posters

pnutwannabe · Post by **pnutwannabe** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:08 am

Do you think that we should kick people that dont have a single post?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:49 am

i think we should have sex with them

and if they're shit, kick them.

starshines311 · Post by **starshines311** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:00 pm

i think if they dont' have one single post, then we should kick them.

Alexnova · Post by **Alexnova** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:13 pm

If they aren't taking up bandwith, then there isn't a reason to kick em. But if they are, then sure.

If they come back they'll probably want to register their username again. So you gotta delete it.

JuicyJ · Post by **JuicyJ** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 5:45 pm

WHy the fuck would you go ahead and kick fellow 311 fans just bc they dont post here? Not everyone sits behind the computer all day getting a monitor tan patiently waiting on a message board for someone to reply to his/her posts.

Bitches.

Rap Weasel · Post by **Rap Weasel** » Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:46 pm

TripleA wrote:WHy the fuck would you go ahead and kick fellow 311 fans just bc they dont post here? Not everyone sits behind the computer all day getting a monitor tan patiently waiting on a message board for someone to reply to his/her posts.

Bitches.

HAHAHAHAHAHA I agree!

Post by **Station** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:34 am

Most people like to (or should) lurk around before ever posting. It gives people a chance to see what it's like. I know you can do that without even registering, but what's the point of kicking them out? You can always sort the userlist by posts to see all the people who DO post.

If we did prune any accounts it would be for people who registered like, 6 months ago and STILL haven't posted.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:52 pm

ChickenLegzzzzz lolz

Taiyed Brodels

No posters

Kick them or let them stay?

No posters